Haggerty and Ericson (2000) refer to several attributes of the ‘surveillant assemblage’….

Haggerty and Ericson (2000) refer to several attributes of the ‘surveillant assemblage’. Please define the surveillant assemblage. Second, please describe how a ‘multi-agency partnership’ in national security or policing might be understood as a surveillant assemblage. Provide an example of a multi-agency national security or policing partnership in Australia to illustrate your response in detail, relying on the concepts from Haggerty and Ericson (2000). (300 Words, references not counted)

Question 2:O’Malley (2010) refers to ‘simulated justice’. What does this mean? How has ‘justice’ changed in the context of ‘telemetric policing’ that O’Malley describes? Provide an example to illustrate your argument. (300 Words, references not counted)
Document Preview:

ACR210 Crime Surveillance and Society Assessment 5 (15%) Rubric CriteriaNeeds More Attention (0-7)Pass (7.5)Credit (8-9)Distinction (10-12)High Distinction (12-15)Knowledge: Key Concepts (5 marks)You have generally not sufficiently addressed the key concept of the surveillant assemblage and/or the notion of ‘simulated justice’. Please revisit the unit materials and discuss this with teaching staff.You have demonstrated a sufficient knowledge and understanding of the concept of surveillant assemblage and/or simulated justice, but this is lacking in sufficient depth in key areas. These include applying the concept to examples assigned in the unit materials. One or both of your responses could generally have been improved by linking these concepts in more detail with your chosen examples.You have demonstrated a reasonable knowledge and understanding of the concepts in the related aspects of the concepts surveillant assemblage and/or simulated justice. This knowledge includes the ‘surveillant assemblage’ perspective as well how its associated terms fit with your example. You may have addressed one concept slightly better than another. One or both could generally have been improved by linking the attributes of these concepts to your chosen examples.You have demonstrated a sound knowledge and understanding of the concepts in the related aspects of the concepts surveillant assemblage and/or simulated justice. This knowledge includes the ‘surveillant assemblage’ concept as well how its associated aspects fit with your example. You may have addressed one concept slightly better than another. One or both were very well done, but could have been improved by linking the attributes of these concepts to your chosen examples.You have demonstrated an excellent knowledge and understanding of the concepts in the related aspects of the concepts surveillant assemblage and/or simulated justice. This knowledge includes the ‘surveillant assemblage’ concept as well how its..