Diseases : Describe the disease, its prevalence, its incidence and general knowledge of the…

Week 8 assignment
Tutor MUST have a good command of the English language. Please do not use big or over complicated words. I have had to rewrite papers from this site. Keep it simple, it must flow and be able to read easily for the reader. Please follow the rubric
You will be creating a case report in stages over four course topics. This assignment will add to your previous work in Topic 5. Use an example from your own personal practice, experience, or own personal/family; however, simulated cases are not acceptable for practice hours and therefore not acceptable for this assignment. Examples might include a patient with Duchesne’s muscular dystrophy. Huntington’s disease, Down’s syndrome, sickle cell anemia, BRCA 1 or BRCA 2 mutations, or other genetic disorder that you and/or the organization you practice in may specialize in treating.
General Requirements:
Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:

  • This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
  • Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.
  • This assignment requires that at least two additional scholarly research sources related to this topic, and at least one in-text citation from each source be included.
  • You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.

Include the following:

  • Guidelines and reasons behind the FDA regulations for introducing new pharmaceutical agents (policy).
  • The role that money and grants play in scientific advances/the economics of health care (capitalism).
  • The role and involvement family plays into the health care decision.

Directions:
For this assignment (Conclusion of the Case Report), include previous Parts 1, 2, and 3 of the Case Report in one document, combined with additional genetics information learned from the assigned readings from all course topics. This final Case Report document should include the following:
This is for the Conclusion of the Case Report on Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), I have provided the attachments for Case Parts, 1, 2, and 3
This is the assignment

  1. Describe the disease, its prevalence, its incidence and general knowledge of the disease.
  2. Discuss the laboratory testing that can be done.
  3. Describe if chromosomal analysis is/was indicated, and detail the chromosomal change that caused the disease if it is a chromosomal disorder.
  4. Describe the disorder in terms of its origin as either a single gene inheritance, or as a complex inheritance and considerations for practice and patient education.
  5. Describe the gene mutation of the disease, as well as whether it is acquired or inherited, and how the mutation occurs.
  6. Examine how genetics can influence policy issues.
  7. Discuss any nutritional influences for this disease.
  8. Process of nutritional assessment and counseling as it relates to health, prevention, screening, diagnostics, prognostics, selection of treatment, and monitoring of treatment effectiveness.

Continue your paper with 1,000-1,250 words which include the following:

  1. Discuss any ethical considerations for this disease.
  2. Compare how genetics can improve care and health outcomes while reducing cost to usual practices.
  3. Discuss the changes in approaches to care when new evidence warrants evaluation of other options for improving outcomes or decreasing adverse events.
  4. Create a plan for how you might educate colleagues and/or patients on this genetic disorder.

Apply Rubrics
Case Report: Cumulative

1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less Than Satisfactory
74.00%
3
Satisfactory
79.00%
4
Good
87.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
70.0 %Content
20.0 %Discussion of Ethical Considerations for This Disease Discussion of ethical considerations for this disease is not present. Discussion of ethical considerations for this disease is present but incomplete. Discussion of ethical considerations for this disease is present but done at a perfunctory level. Discussion of ethical considerations for this disease is clearly presented. Discussion is convincing. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources. Discussion of ethical considerations for this disease is clearly present. Discussion is insightful. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
20.0 %Comparison of How Genetics Can Improve Care and Health Outcomes While Reducing Cost to Usual Practices Comparison of how genetics can improve care and health outcomes while reducing cost to usual practices is not present. Comparison of how genetics can improve care and health outcomes while reducing cost to usual practices is present but incomplete. Comparison of how genetics can improve care and health outcomes while reducing cost to usual practices is present but done at a perfunctory level. Comparison of how genetics can improve care and health outcomes while reducing cost to usual practices is clearly present. Discussion is convincing. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources. Comparison of how genetics can improve care and health outcomes while reducing cost to usual practices is clearly present. Discussion is insightful. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
15.0 %Discussion of the Changes in Approaches to Care When New Evidence Warrants Evaluation of Other Options for Improving Outcomes or Decreasing Adverse Events Discussion of the changes in approaches to care when new evidence warrants evaluation of other options for improving outcomes or decreasing adverse events is not presented. Discussion of the changes in approaches to care when new evidence warrants evaluation of other options for improving outcomes or decreasing adverse events is presented but incomplete. Discussion of the changes in approaches to care when new evidence warrants evaluation of other options for improving outcomes or decreasing adverse events is presented but done at a perfunctory level. Discussion of the changes in approaches to care when new evidence warrants evaluation of other options for improving outcomes or decreasing adverse events is clearly presented. Discussion is convincing. Information presented is from mostly current scholarly but some outdated sources are used. Discussion of the changes in approaches to care when new evidence warrants evaluation of other options for improving outcomes or decreasing adverse events is clearly presented. Discussion is insightful and detailed. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
10.0 %Plan for How You Might Educate Colleagues and/or Patients on This Genetic Disorder A plan for how you might educate colleagues and/or patients on this genetic disorder is not presented. A plan for how you might educate colleagues and/or patients on this genetic disorder is presented but incomplete. A plan for how you might educate colleagues and/or patients on this genetic disorder is presented but done at a perfunctory level. A plan for how you might educate colleagues and/or patients on this genetic disorder is clearly presented. Discussion is convincing. A plan for how you might educate colleagues and/or patients on this genetic disorder is clearly presented. Discussion is insightful and detailed.
5.0 %Previous Case Reports are Included as the Beginning of this Paper Previous case reports are included as the beginning of this paper is not present. Previous case reports are included as the beginning of this paper but missing two areas. Previous case reports are included as the beginning of this paper but missing one area. Previous case reports are included as the beginning of this Paper is completely present.
20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
7.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
8.0 %Argument Logic and Construction Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
10.0 %Format
5.0 %Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. All format elements are correct.
5.0 %Research Citations (In-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment and style) No reference page is included. No citations are used. Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used. Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present. Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct. In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.